CREDIT CARD DISPUTES · FCBA & REGULATION Z
A denied credit card dispute isn’t the final word.
Know your rights under the Fair Credit Billing Act.
A credit-card billing error can become more than an unexpected balance. The Fair Credit Billing Act gives consumers a process for challenging certain charges—and requires creditors to respond properly.
Request a free case review →No attorney’s fees unless we win. Fee terms and case expenses are addressed in your written engagement agreement.
UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS
What is the Fair Credit Billing Act?
The Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) is part of the federal Truth in Lending Act. Its billing-error protections, implemented through Regulation Z, generally apply to consumer open-end credit accounts, including credit cards. They establish how to notify a creditor of an error, what happens during the investigation, and how the creditor must explain its decision.
A card issuer’s customer-service policy is only one part of the picture. A timely, qualifying dispute can trigger federal obligations even when a merchant refuses a refund.
Charges you did not authorize
Transactions made by someone without authority to use your account, including certain fraudulent purchases and account-takeover charges.
Incorrect bills or missing credits
Duplicate charges, incorrect amounts, accounting mistakes, and payments or issued credits that were not properly applied.
Goods or services not delivered
Charges for purchases not accepted or not delivered as agreed. A disagreement about the quality of an accepted purchase can involve different rules.
These billing-error procedures are different from the rules for money withdrawn from a checking account. For debit cards, ATM withdrawals, or unauthorized electronic transfers, visit our EFTA and debit-card dispute page.
Source: Regulation Z, § 1026.13(a), and official interpretations.
PRESERVE THE PAPER TRAIL
How to dispute a credit-card billing error
Call the issuer promptly if your card or account is compromised. For the FCBA billing-error process, also follow the written-notice requirements. An ordinary phone call or an in-app chargeback request should not be assumed to satisfy them.
- Find the billing-inquiries address. Use the address the creditor designates for billing errors, which may differ from its payment address.
- Identify the account and disputed entries. Provide enough information to identify you and your account. To the extent possible, give the transaction date, amount, type of error, and why you believe it is wrong.
- Send supporting copies and keep originals. Relevant records may include the statement, receipts, order confirmations, delivery information, and merchant communications.
- Keep proof of delivery. The standard deadline concerns when the creditor receives the notice. Mailing at the last minute can leave you outside the required window.
Can I submit the notice electronically?
Yes, if the creditor’s billing-rights statement says it accepts electronic billing-error notices and specifies how to submit them. Follow that designated method and save the confirmation. Do not assume any email address, chat, or app button qualifies.
A clear explanation might read: “I dispute the $240 charge dated September 12 because it appears twice on my statement. I authorized one purchase. Please investigate the duplicate entry and correct the balance and related charges.” Adapt the explanation to your actual facts and include the account-identifying information required by the creditor’s instructions.
THREE DEADLINES TO KNOW
The FCBA dispute timeline
The creditor generally must receive your written notice within 60 days after transmitting the first statement showing the error. The clock is tied to the statement—not simply the purchase date.
The creditor must send a written acknowledgment within 30 days after receiving a qualifying notice, unless it has already completed the required resolution within that period.
The creditor must resolve the dispute within two complete billing cycles after receiving the notice, with an outside limit of 90 days. It does not automatically get 90 days in every case.
Different rules can affect a missing statement or missing credit. These notice deadlines also differ from the time limit for bringing a legal claim. Do not assume an internal appeal or regulator complaint extends a filing deadline.
Do I have to pay while the dispute is pending?
While a properly initiated billing-error dispute is being resolved, you may withhold the disputed amount and related finance or other charges. Continue paying the undisputed portion of your bill on time. Disputing one transaction does not excuse unrelated payments.
During that process, the creditor cannot try to collect the disputed amount or report delinquency because you withheld that amount and related charges. It may report that the account is disputed, and it may count the disputed balance against your available credit. Unpaid, undisputed amounts can still create problems.
Unlike the debit-account investigation framework, these credit-card rules do not generally require an EFTA-style provisional credit. A temporary credit may be offered, but it does not itself establish that the dispute is finally resolved.
WHEN THE ISSUER SAYS NO
Credit-card fraud claim denied: what can I do?
If your issuer rejected an unauthorized-charge claim, keep the denial, statement, and any written dispute you sent. Tell us whether the charge was made by someone else or concerns a purchase you authorized. A free case review can assess which protections apply and what the issuer considered.
A denial does not automatically establish a legal violation. It does make the investigation, timing, and explanation worth reviewing. Before rejecting a qualifying billing-error claim, the creditor must conduct a reasonable investigation and provide a written explanation of its reasons.
- Did the issuer address the specific error you reported?
- Did it acknowledge and resolve the dispute within the applicable periods?
- Did it correct any error it found and applicable related charges?
- Did it provide copies of documentary evidence of the debt when you requested them?
- Did collection efforts or credit reporting occur while the protected dispute process was pending?
Keep the denial letter and request the evidence supporting the decision. For a nondelivery dispute, the investigation should address whether the goods or services were actually delivered, mailed, or sent as agreed. A merchant’s response is evidence to examine, not a reason to ignore contrary records.
If the issuer concludes you owe money, additional payment-notice and credit-reporting rules apply after resolution. Do not assume you can indefinitely withhold payment merely by repeating the dispute; have the decision and next deadlines reviewed promptly.
Source: Investigation, explanations, and post-resolution duties, § 1026.13(e)–(g).
Unauthorized use and merchant disputes: separate protections
Unauthorized credit-card use
Regulation Z separately limits liability for unauthorized credit-card use. When liability may lawfully be imposed, it generally cannot exceed the lesser of $50 or the unauthorized use before the issuer is notified. This is not an automatic $50 deductible. These protections are independent of the 60-day billing-error notice procedure, so a late billing dispute does not necessarily end the analysis. Report unauthorized use immediately.
For certain merchant disputes, a cardholder may also assert claims or defenses against the issuer. That route generally requires a good-faith attempt to resolve the problem with the merchant, a transaction exceeding $50, and a purchase in the same state as the cardholder’s designated address or within 100 miles of it, subject to exceptions. Recovery through this mechanism is limited by the credit outstanding for the purchase when the issuer is first notified.
Those conditions should not be applied to every FCBA billing error. For example, the billing-error procedure for goods not delivered as agreed does not require a consumer to contact the merchant first. The facts determine which protection applies.
Sources: Unauthorized use and claims or defenses, § 1026.12(b)–(c); nondelivery billing errors, § 1026.13(a)(3).
How a credit-card dispute lawyer can help
A review can compare the issuer’s actions with the applicable requirements, identify missing records, and assess whether a legal claim is supported. Depending on the violation and evidence, relief may include an account correction, actual damages, applicable statutory damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in a successful action. A refund or damages award is not guaranteed.
Your card agreement may require arbitration or preliminary notice before a claim proceeds. Fee allocation depends on the agreement and applicable rules; we do not assume the issuer pays every expense. Many Truth in Lending Act damages claims carry a one-year limitations period, but the particular claim, accrual date, and exceptions need individual review.
No attorney’s fees unless we win. The written engagement agreement explains the fee arrangement and responsibility for case expenses. Requesting a review does not create an attorney-client relationship or pause a deadline.
For a useful first review, gather your statements, written dispute, delivery confirmation, acknowledgment, denial, merchant records, and a short timeline. Use the initial form to summarize the issue; do not submit full card numbers, passwords, or full Social Security numbers.
Source: Truth in Lending Act civil liability, 15 U.S.C. § 1640.
Common FCBA questions
Is an FCBA dispute the same as a chargeback?
No. A chargeback usually follows card-network procedures. FCBA billing-error rights come from federal law and have their own notice requirements and deadlines. A chargeback request can overlap with a legal billing dispute, but the two should not be treated as interchangeable.
Can I dispute a charge I already paid?
Payment does not by itself prevent a timely billing-error notice. The account history, error, and notice date still matter. Separate merchant claims-and-defenses rules can depend on how much credit remains outstanding for that purchase.
Does a merchant’s “no refunds” policy end my rights?
No. A refund policy does not by itself resolve whether a charge was unauthorized, duplicated, or for something not delivered as agreed. Dissatisfaction with an accepted purchase raises a different question and does not automatically establish a billing error.
Does FCBA cover debit-card purchases?
Ordinary debit-card purchases drawing from a deposit account generally fall under a different framework. See our EFTA guide for reporting unauthorized transfers and understanding bank investigation duties.
What if the dispute affected my credit report?
Save the report, payment history, and dispute correspondence. Regulation Z restricts certain reporting during a qualifying billing dispute. Inaccurate credit reporting can also raise separate Fair Credit Reporting Act issues, with different requirements. See our identity-theft and FCRA credit-report dispute page for reporting issues involving fraudulent accounts or inaccurate information.
Legal sources checked October 1, 2026. General information, not legal advice. Read the disclaimer.
No attorney’s fees unless we win. Fee terms and responsibility for case expenses are addressed in your written engagement agreement.
FREE CASE REVIEW
Let’s talk about
what happened.
Complete our online form or call with a brief description of your dispute.
We’ll discuss what information is needed next.
Please do not provide account passwords, PINs, or your full Social Security number.